Signal Post Telephones

Why are telephones needed at signals?

Signal Post Telephone The need for a telephone at signals can be traced back to a requirement of the Railway Companies' Rule Book. This was introduced following the enquiry into a crash at Norton Fitzwarren on the main West of England line of the Great Western Railway in November 1890.

The signalman had totally forgotten about a goods train which he had allowed to stand on the main line, and signalled an express train onto a collision course with the goods train. Rule 55 states that a driver held by a signal at stop must inform the signaller within 3 minutes, or immediately in fog or falling snow. Originally this was done by sending the fireman or secondman to the signalbox. This was not a problem in the early days where the area controlled by each signalbox was small, but in later times it became necessary to use the telephone as signals became further from their controlling signalbox. This signal K699 (left) on the Down fast at Hitchin is some 50 km away from its controlling signalbox at Kings Cross

The basic principle of Rule 55 is still present in today's Rule Book, but the telephone is now supplemented by in-cab radio systems and, as a last resort, mobile telephones. Indeed a whole section of the present Rail Safety & Standards Board Rule Book, GE/RT8000, Module S4, is devoted to the duties of drivers detained at signals and so on. It states:

"When your train is detained on a running line at a signal at danger, or without a movement authority (MA), you must contact the signaller as soon as possible.
However, you may wait for up to two minutes before contacting the signaller if you can see an obvious reason for the signal being at danger...."
 
"You must contact the signaller by using the train radio. If it is not possible to use the train radio and a signal post telephone is provided, you must use it to contact the signaller.... "


What are the safety requirements?

The requirements are:

  1. The signaller must only be able to talk to one driver at once.
  2. The signaller must at all times be aware of the identity of the calling party.
  3. There must be no overhearing, so that one driver cannot hear instructions intended for another.

It hardly needs adding that speech must be sufficiently lound and clear that instructions can be passed without misunderstanding.

How are these achieved?

The simplest implementation of a signal post telephone is the point-to-point link. This could typically have been achieved with a local-battery, magneto-calling telephone at each end. All of the safety requirements are readily met since the circuit is completely separate from all others and the telephone at the signalbox can be labelled clearly with the signal identity.

This simple system is only suitable for small signalboxes with very few signal post telephones. Additionally, local-battery telephones are a maintenance liability, needing frequent battery changes - especially if they are left off-hook.

Signal Box Concentrator in use

At larger signalboxes the Railway Companies introduced a small switchboard to answer calls. This became known as a Concentrator, since it concentrated the calls from the many external lines onto one telephone for the signaller. There have been many different designs of concentrator over the years and between the different Regions. Pictured left is an Eastern Region Standard Concentrator in use at Wood Green Signal Box in the 1970s. Note the essential equipment in the foreground. Below, right, is the same design of concentrator, still in use at Broxbourne in 2001. Click for a larger image

A reminiscence received from Paul Hepworth: " The long haired signaller at Wood Green is Jimmy Brown. When the 13 stagework block bells on the shelf above the panel were temporarily wired pre-commissioning, to ring back on themselves for testing, Jimmy discovered how to play a church bell peal on them with the panel bell pushes!"


ER Concentrator at Broxbourne

Concentrators were constructed on similar lines to office switchboards, using Post Office keys and switchboard lamps, but various steps were necessary to achieve the safety requirements. On a normal office switchboard, if the operator throws two speak keys at once they can speak to both extensions served by those keys. To prevent this happening on a concentrator, the principle of 'chain-locking' is employed. When a speak key is thrown, break contacts operate to disconnect the circuit immediately adjacent in one direction. This break contact wiring is daisy-chained along the speak keys from first to last, giving an order of precedence to keys, either left-to-right, or right-to-left.


Chain Locking Principle

Chain-locking satisfies the first safety requirement. The second requirement is met by providing a lamp indication and label with each key to show when that circuit is connected to the signaller's handset. The third requirement of no overhearing is met by careful design and construction of the concentrator so that cross-talk between circuits is minimised.

The Attraction of Omnibus Telephones

Signal post telephones are lightly used compared with office telephones since they are only needed when a train has been stopped at a signal. Therefore it would appear wasteful to provide a separate pair of wires to each signal when it is unlikely that more than one telephone will be in use at any one time.

Apart from junctions, signals are positioned at regular distances along a railway track in order to keep the trains suitably separated.

It is therefore attractive to use one pair of wires along the railway track to serve the telephones at each signal down the line controlled from the same signalbox.

The Problems with Omnibus Telephones

Looking back at the safety requirements, if all the telephones are connected to the same pair of wires, how do we distinguish which telephone is calling the signaller?

Furthermore, if one telephone is in use, how do we stop the other telephones overhearing the conversation between driver and signaller?

To find out how these problems were solved in a simple, yet ingenious way move on to the article which follows about the STC Selective Telephone System


Railway Telecomms Index

© 2000, Sam Hallas
References: Red for Danger, Rolt, L.T.C., Sutton Publishing, 1998, ISBN 0-7509-2047-5
Trains or shunting movements detained, or vehicles left on running lines, GE/RT8000/S4, Rail Safety & Standards Board, December 2015

Photos & text, © 2000/ 2001, 2005, & 2007 Sam Hallas